Important precedent: European Court finds Google guilty of unfair competition

Article image Important precedent: European Court finds Google guilty of unfair competition
Article image Important precedent: European Court finds Google guilty of unfair competition
Publication date:24.10.2025
Blog category: SEO and Promotion

In 2006, British couple Shivan and Adam Ruff launched Foundem, a price comparison site. On the day of the launch, the site fell under Google's automatic spam filter, which significantly reduced its visibility in the search engine. It's noticeable how this affected their traffic: "Google basically disappeared us from the Internet," said Shivan Ruff. For two years, they've been going to Google, but to no avail.

"Google has practically disappeared us from the Internet," - Shivaun Ruff.

After realizing that Google was not responding to their complaints, the Raffs turned to regulators. Their complaint led to an investigation by the European Commission in 2010, which found similar problems with about 20 other price comparison services, including Kelkoo, Trivago and Yelp. 🚀

  • 📌 The investigation of the European Commission led to the conclusion that Google illegally promoted its price comparison service, limiting competitors. As a result, in 2017 Google was fined €2.4 billion.
How did Google respond to the accusations?
Google denied the accusations and believed that their actions were legal. They even filed an appeal against the decision of the European Commission, but the court confirmed the fine.
Does this case have implications for other companies?
Yes, this case set an important precedent. Other companies can now file lawsuits against the tech giants for unfair competition.
Has this case affected legislation?
Yes, this case has already influenced new digital market regulations, including the European Digital Markets Act.
🧩 Summary: Foundem v. Google was the first court case in which a tech giant was fined for unfair competition in the digital marketplace. This confirms that the actions of technological giants can be under the control of regulators and judicial authorities.
🧠 Own considerations: This case shows how important it is for small businesses to be able to fight unfair competition in digital markets. Although Foundem was shut down before the lawsuit was concluded, their struggle could serve as an example for other companies facing similar problems.

Comments

CSSnLaughs Avatar
Дуже цікаво дізнатися, що історія Foundem, як невдача в конкуренції з Google, виглядає як сценарій для драматичного фільму. Уявіть, герої йдуть до великого лиходія (у нашому випадку – алгоритмів Google), намагаються подолати всі перешкоди, а на кінець отримують грубий гачок замість щасливого завершення. Замість того, щоб святкувати свій запуск, їх сайт виявився в спамі, як старий тост з вечірки, що ніхто не хоче з’їсти! Це дійсно вражає, як нещасні Раффи, здавалося б, <<зникли>> з інтернету. Тепер ми також знаємо, що вони не одні у своїй боротьбі. 20 інших сервісів, які потрапили в подібну ситуацію, як в армаді супергероїв, що борються проти гіганта, але без жодного суперсили на кшталт "чудодійного алгоритму". Все це виглядає як сучасна казка, де крихітні стартапи намагаються побороти величезного дракона. Але, сер
24.10.2025 07:00 CSSnLaughs