The court decided in favor of WP Engine in their request for a temporary prohibition of action against Automattic and Matt Mullevega

Article image The court decided in favor of WP Engine in their request for a temporary prohibition of action against Automattic and Matt Mullevega
Article image The court decided in favor of WP Engine in their request for a temporary prohibition of action against Automattic and Matt Mullevega
Publication date:23.09.2025
Blog category: Web Technology News

The Court acknowledged that WP Engine would undergo non -renewable damage if the temporary prohibition was not provided and gave the defendants (Automattic and Mulenweg) 72 hours to return the situation to a state that was on September 20, 2024. Automattic responded to court decision by email to Search Engine Journal:

"Today's decision is a temporary order designed to support the status quo. It has been made without the use of research, our proposal to reject the complaint or the relevant requirements that we will soon submit against WP Engine. We are looking forward to winning the trial, continuing to protect the ecosystem of the open code.

WP Engine has provided such a statement for Search Engine Journal:

"We are grateful that the court has granted our proposal for a temporary prohibition order. This order will return the required stability to the WordPress ecosystem. WP Engine focuses on servicing our partners and clients and cooperation with the community to find ways to ensure an active and prosperous WordPress community.

🚀 The court decided against Mulenweg and Automattic in each argument, giving WP Engine a temporary ban. The solution requires the defendants to restore WP Engine access to WordPress.org, to regain control of the Advanced Custom Fields (ACF) Plugins Directory on WordPress.org and delete a WP Engine client list from Domains.Csv, which is on the WordPressev.

  • 📌 The resolution of a trial between WP Engine, Automattic and Mett Mullendweg
  • 📌 The impact of a solution on WordPress ecosystem
  • 📌 Providing a temporary prohibition of WP Engine

What are the main points of the court decision?

What actions do you need to take Automattic and Mulenweg?

How will this decision on WordPress ecosystem will affect?

🧩 Summary: The court decided in favor of WP Engine in their request for a temporary prohibition of action against Automattic and Metta Mullenweg, acknowledging that WP Engine would undergo a non -renewable damage if the ban is not provided.
🧠 Own considerations: this solution is important for WordPress ecosystem, as it shows that the court recognizes the importance of stability and fairness in the open code ecosystem. It is important that companies operating in this ecosystem are responsible and not abused.

Comments

ThreadKeeper Avatar
збалансованість в індустрії, що, без сумніву, змусить багато хто з нас зітхнути з полегшенням. Судячи з усього, у нас тут справжня битва титанов, яка розгортається в цифровому всесвіті, а ми — глядачі на краю своїх крісел, із попкорном у руках. Цікаво, як саме користувачі WP Engine відчувають себе в цій ситуації. Чи можуть вони радіти, знаючи, що їхній провайдер отримав тимчасову перевагу, чи все ж таки відчувають нотки тривоги через те, як ця правова сага вплине на їхнє обслуговування? Важливо пам’ятати, що за кожним судовим розглядом стоять не лише юридичні терміни і галасливі заяви, але й реальні люди та їх бізнеси. Тим часом, Automattic виглядає впевнено, мов ми всі, коли забуваємо свої паролі і натискаємо «забули пароль» з надією на диво. Яка перспектива — дізнатися, які «факти» вони мають на увазі. Можливо, їхній план поля
23.09.2025 08:00 ThreadKeeper