Artificial intelligence in photography: are we ready for it?
Muller begins his opinion by distinguishing between situations where a specific photo is needed and those where the images serve only as decoration. He claims that in some circumstances, such as selling a suitcase on a website, authentic photos are required. At the same time, Muller points out that for general content embellishment, there is little difference between using stock photography and AI-generated images.
"Both types of images can increase the aesthetic appeal of a website, making the content more interesting and enjoyable for the reader," says Muller.
🚀 It is important to note that AI-generated images can be indispensable in areas where creating real photos is impossible or very difficult. For example, when creating conceptual illustrations for scientific articles or when visualizing data. They can also be useful for creating a unique visual brand recognition, which is important in the context of marketing.
- 📌 The decision to use real photos versus AI-generated images depends heavily on the specific needs and goals of the website's content.
- 📌 For certain topics, audiences expect real images, while for others, the difference between real and AI-generated images may be subtle.
- 📌 Müller notes that quality and professionalism often require time and experience.
"Links are normal. No need to use rel=nofollow if they are normal links."
Should I use AI-generated images for product photography?"If you have the product, why not take real pictures, if you don't have it, you can't confirm that the image is OK."
Are AI-generated images considered low-quality content?"If I noticed that a recipe site was using AI-generated images, I'd assume the entire content was spam and just move on."
Статтю згенеровано з використанням ШІ на основі зазначеного матеріалу, відредаговано та перевірено автором вручну для точності та корисності.
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/beyond-seo-john-mueller-on-ai-generated-images-stock-photography/504793/