Low -content content: looks good, but is it really like that?
John Müller from Google discusses the problem of low -content content, which at first glance looks good but has no deep content or expertise. One of the signals that indicate the poor quality of the material is the use of AI -Zhegenerated Image. Muller did not claim that AI-Zemenae images directly indicate poor quality, but he described his perception of this as "you know it when you see."
Muller stated: "How often in the non-SEO rings" technical " /" expert "articles use ai-married image? I absolutely like to see them. Why? Because I know that I can ignore the article they ignored during writing. And why not block them on social networks?"
🚀 Muller also noted that low -voltage content that "looks good" still remains low. His comments do not directly relate to AI images, but low-content content that "looks good", but in fact they are not.
He wrote: "I fight with the comments" But our low -volume work really looks good ". Realistically, cheaply and quickly will be owned when it comes to mass production of content, so nothing will disappear in the near future, maybe never.
- 📌 Low -ash content may look good but not have true value
- 📌 AI-Generated Images can be an indicator
- 📌 Content quality assessment should be more detailed than just "looks good"
Статтю згенеровано з використанням ШІ на основі зазначеного матеріалу, відредаговано та перевірено автором вручну для точності та корисності.
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-on-low-effort-content-that-looks-good/541113/
