Investigation of the impact of artificial intelligence on processing requests type your money or your life (YMYL)


SE Ranking has conducted a new research that compares as artificial intelligence, including Google AI OverViews (AIOS), Chatgpt and Deeseek, processes "Your Money or Your Life" requests. The study included 40 requests from various fields: health, rights, finances, politics.
Google generates AIOS for 51% YMYL queries, this is slightly more than 50% in October. Chatgpt has a 100% reaction to YMYL search and Deeceek - 90%.
Deeseek generates longer answers (391 word on average) with numerous sources (28 for answer), Chatgpt offers medium length content (234 words) with fewer sources (10 for answer), Google provides the shortest answers (190 words) with minimal quotations (7 sources).
🚀 When using subjectivity, Chatgpt provides the most objective content (estimate of 0.393), Google AI OverViews ranks second (0.427 estimation), and Deeseek shows the highest subjectivity (grade 0.446).
Chatgpt, Deepeseek and Google provide different content depending on the YMYL request category, in particular in health, legal issues and finance.
🧠 Deeseek refused to respond to Taiwan's independence, Tiananmen's Square, Human Rights in China and sites banned in China.
- 📌 Google is selective. The content, which is displayed in AIOS, must meet high quality standards, especially for YMYL.
- 📌 AIOS Google cite unique and various sources for YMYL search. This increases visibility, but creates competition for clicks.
- 📌 Various artificial intelligence systems prefer specific styles, lengths and details in content.
- 📌 All three platforms prefer a prevention in sensitive topics, with the highest level of caution in health - 37%.
Статтю згенеровано з використанням ШІ на основі зазначеного матеріалу, відредаговано та перевірено автором вручну для точності та корисності.
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-google-chatgpt-deepseek-handle-ymyl-searches/541193/